San Antonio
I know that the nuclear reactor exploded in the Ukraine, but which city was evacuated? I think it started with a "Jo..." I also know that it has been left unescorted with respect to 20 years now. Which city is it again?
Livingston
Yup it was the Chernobyl Disaster the closest city was Pripyat and it is now a abandoned city there was around 50,000 people living in the city prior to the accident.
Hiram
Chernobyl
Guntersville
i thought that was chernobol
Red Lick
chernobyl
Cochiti
I believe it was Pripyat.
Mission
Chernobyl, Ukraine
Chinle
Chair Noble
Victory
Chernobyl.
Oceanport
it was trinoble spelling might be incorrect but im 100% sure
Oakville
chernobyl
Maquoketa
its definitely Chernobyl.
Libby
It was the Chernobyl Disaster. The reactor is located near Prypiat which was evacuated and abandoned
Chesterfield
The city is called Pripyat.
Comanche
chernobyl
Palouse
Chernobyl, then part of USSR.
Showing posts with label hawaii tsunami. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hawaii tsunami. Show all posts
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Control rods in a nuclear reactor are used to?
Colony
Control rods in a nuclear reactor are used toA. conceive neutrons. B. step tinder rods around broach the chamber. C. provide neutrons to initiate reactions. D. provide chilling alongside decreasing the temperature of the water. E. increase the temperature of the water.
Skedee
A. /////// Read more.
North Bay
You really arn't going to do this for real are you?'A' Absorb Nutrons.
Control rods in a nuclear reactor are used toA. conceive neutrons. B. step tinder rods around broach the chamber. C. provide neutrons to initiate reactions. D. provide chilling alongside decreasing the temperature of the water. E. increase the temperature of the water.
Skedee
A. /////// Read more.
North Bay
You really arn't going to do this for real are you?'A' Absorb Nutrons.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
What types of radiation will leak in the event of a meltdown at a nuclear reactor? all four main groups?
Silver Lake
Alpha a/o beta particles, gamma radiation a/o x-rays, or neutron particles? From a meltdown or a atomic fission/fusion warhead blast? Does anyone know the alternative radiations of each occurrence, or where to veneer this up?
Lublin
all of them are released in reactors and bombs, initially there will be much neutron radiation, after the fission/fusion reaction ends it will be mostly beta/gamma/x-rays. Fission products release mostly beta and gamma as they decay, some also release alpha. http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Fission_pro…X-rays are almost always created with ionizing radiation due to the interaction of the ionized electrons with matter, as the ionized electrons slow rapidly in a medium they release x-rays:http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Bremsstrahl…
Altus
almost none. In the event of a reactor meltdown, the plants are designed such that no significant level of radiation will sell down the river released. I can't state regarding convinced what the NRC limit is... but the Canadian standard is that no power plant, even in the example of a meltdown, shall break faith with answerable in the matter of more than one in one loads deaths as a result informed on it's presence. That is the average, added to manner of talking retire experience as an employee in the nuclear industry, normal put to use is to nourish a safety focus well below that one in a million confines.
Hudson
During fission reactions all types of radiation are released, after the fission reaction stops there is almost no neutron radiation. In both cases the fission reaction stops eminently quickly. The fission odds and ends then decay emancipation radiation.
Alpha a/o beta particles, gamma radiation a/o x-rays, or neutron particles? From a meltdown or a atomic fission/fusion warhead blast? Does anyone know the alternative radiations of each occurrence, or where to veneer this up?
Lublin
all of them are released in reactors and bombs, initially there will be much neutron radiation, after the fission/fusion reaction ends it will be mostly beta/gamma/x-rays. Fission products release mostly beta and gamma as they decay, some also release alpha. http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Fission_pro…X-rays are almost always created with ionizing radiation due to the interaction of the ionized electrons with matter, as the ionized electrons slow rapidly in a medium they release x-rays:http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Bremsstrahl…
Altus
almost none. In the event of a reactor meltdown, the plants are designed such that no significant level of radiation will sell down the river released. I can't state regarding convinced what the NRC limit is... but the Canadian standard is that no power plant, even in the example of a meltdown, shall break faith with answerable in the matter of more than one in one loads deaths as a result informed on it's presence. That is the average, added to manner of talking retire experience as an employee in the nuclear industry, normal put to use is to nourish a safety focus well below that one in a million confines.
Hudson
During fission reactions all types of radiation are released, after the fission reaction stops there is almost no neutron radiation. In both cases the fission reaction stops eminently quickly. The fission odds and ends then decay emancipation radiation.
How long until a nuclear reactor pays off?
Selmont-West Selmont
I'm working on a research paper for my Economics class. I've chosen to research nuclear energy, added to I just can't have the hallmabks grate on nerves prove guilty myriad statistics regarding the pay return cognizant of a typical atomic reactor in the US. I've seen an estimate of 30 one time thrown close by here increased by there, but does anyone know where I can prove guilty some solid data and figures? Thanks!
Marked Tree
I believe what you are asking is how long a reactor has to operate to recover the capitol cost of the initial build. There are continuing costs for operations, maintenance and upgrades. Using gross estimates for a 1,000 Mw plant $6 billion building cost and about $1 million per day profit for 600 days 18 day refueling outage for $100 million would be $500 million every 2 years approximately 24 years completely paid back. These are very conservative numbers. Use the links for more accurate estimates.
St. Lucie
To build a new reactor today - figure around $2000 per installed kilowatt of capacity. so a 1000 MW reactor would be around $2B or $4B for a two unit site. A good figure for O&M is around $10/MWHr - and a good figure for ongoing capital expenses is $20M for a twin unit installation. Power pricing is the challenge - I'd assume $45/MWhr for starters, but if it is a vertically integrated utility, that could be as high as $75/MWHr on average for a power company selling retail. Anything above that would be gravy for a 'merchant' plant. Hope this helps...
Balta
Try www. doe. gov. (department of energy)I use to work on naval nuclear reactors. Can't really tell you anything about the economics of it, but I know that would be the highest legitimate with an increment of relevant source.
I'm working on a research paper for my Economics class. I've chosen to research nuclear energy, added to I just can't have the hallmabks grate on nerves prove guilty myriad statistics regarding the pay return cognizant of a typical atomic reactor in the US. I've seen an estimate of 30 one time thrown close by here increased by there, but does anyone know where I can prove guilty some solid data and figures? Thanks!
Marked Tree
I believe what you are asking is how long a reactor has to operate to recover the capitol cost of the initial build. There are continuing costs for operations, maintenance and upgrades. Using gross estimates for a 1,000 Mw plant $6 billion building cost and about $1 million per day profit for 600 days 18 day refueling outage for $100 million would be $500 million every 2 years approximately 24 years completely paid back. These are very conservative numbers. Use the links for more accurate estimates.
St. Lucie
To build a new reactor today - figure around $2000 per installed kilowatt of capacity. so a 1000 MW reactor would be around $2B or $4B for a two unit site. A good figure for O&M is around $10/MWHr - and a good figure for ongoing capital expenses is $20M for a twin unit installation. Power pricing is the challenge - I'd assume $45/MWhr for starters, but if it is a vertically integrated utility, that could be as high as $75/MWHr on average for a power company selling retail. Anything above that would be gravy for a 'merchant' plant. Hope this helps...
Balta
Try www. doe. gov. (department of energy)I use to work on naval nuclear reactors. Can't really tell you anything about the economics of it, but I know that would be the highest legitimate with an increment of relevant source.
Friday, March 11, 2011
What does nuclear moderation accomplish in a nuclear reactor?
Nashville
Chemistry.
Cottage City
A moderator is used to slow down neutrons. Some commonly used moderators are heavy water, light water(normal water) and graphite. The reason one might want to use a moderator is because sometimes by slowing down the neutrons they are more readily absorbed by the nuclei. For example, when neutrons are released from the splitting of Uranium-235 they are more readily absorbed by Uranium-238 than by other Uranium-235 nuclei however by slowing down the neutrons with a moderator, it allows the neutrons to be more readily absorbed by Uranium-235 to sustaining a chain reaction.
Garden City
I'm no nuclear physicist, so my understanding is rudimentary, but without moderation in the form of more/less fuel rods, water containment/cooling and rods used to absorb neutrons, the reaction could easily get out of control and lead to a melt down situation.
Chemistry.
Cottage City
A moderator is used to slow down neutrons. Some commonly used moderators are heavy water, light water(normal water) and graphite. The reason one might want to use a moderator is because sometimes by slowing down the neutrons they are more readily absorbed by the nuclei. For example, when neutrons are released from the splitting of Uranium-235 they are more readily absorbed by Uranium-238 than by other Uranium-235 nuclei however by slowing down the neutrons with a moderator, it allows the neutrons to be more readily absorbed by Uranium-235 to sustaining a chain reaction.
Garden City
I'm no nuclear physicist, so my understanding is rudimentary, but without moderation in the form of more/less fuel rods, water containment/cooling and rods used to absorb neutrons, the reaction could easily get out of control and lead to a melt down situation.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
How many days is the radiation from japan nuclear reactor explosion effective?
Powder Springs
In other words, when is it safe to go back to the same environment that was exposed with high levels of radiation?
Newtown
Really difficult to know until more information comes out. There was already iodine and cesium being released in the air that was being vented to reduce pressure in the reactors. Whether the destruction of the outer building skin of reactor 1 at the Fukushima plant has released more radioactive material that was otherwise being contained I have no idea. If the amount of material is small then it will likely be dispersed into the environment and thus not pose much of a threat. A major release of material could lead to much longer term issues. The iodine will decay relatively quickly but isotopes like cesium have half-lives of 30 years and such contamination will linger unless steps can be taken to collect and remove it or bury and cover it.
In other words, when is it safe to go back to the same environment that was exposed with high levels of radiation?
Newtown
Really difficult to know until more information comes out. There was already iodine and cesium being released in the air that was being vented to reduce pressure in the reactors. Whether the destruction of the outer building skin of reactor 1 at the Fukushima plant has released more radioactive material that was otherwise being contained I have no idea. If the amount of material is small then it will likely be dispersed into the environment and thus not pose much of a threat. A major release of material could lead to much longer term issues. The iodine will decay relatively quickly but isotopes like cesium have half-lives of 30 years and such contamination will linger unless steps can be taken to collect and remove it or bury and cover it.
How much energy is released by a nuclear reactor if the total mass of the fuel decreases by 45 g?
Rocky Mountain
How much energy is released by a nuclear reactor if the undiluted cumulate apprised of the kindling decreases hard by 4.5 g?
Dubuque
E = mc²c = 3e8 m/sm = .0045 kgE = 4.04e+14 joules.
How much energy is released by a nuclear reactor if the undiluted cumulate apprised of the kindling decreases hard by 4.5 g?
Dubuque
E = mc²c = 3e8 m/sm = .0045 kgE = 4.04e+14 joules.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
How much energy is released by a nuclear reactor if the total mass of the fuel decreases by 85 g?
Ouzinkie
How much energy is released by a nuclear reactor if the total collect on to the fuel decreases hard by 8.5 g? Thanks respecting any help!
Ivanhoe Estates
Assuming all of the reduced fuel has been turned into pure energy, we can use Einstein'sE = mc
Cottondale
How much energy is released by a nuclear reactor if the total collect on to the fuel decreases hard by 8.5 g? Thanks respecting any help!
Ivanhoe Estates
Assuming all of the reduced fuel has been turned into pure energy, we can use Einstein'sE = mc
Cottondale
How did the nuclear reactor and atomic bomb change society?
North Plains
ive been trying to look for the answer but i cant find it anywhere on google or anywhere...anybody know.......nuclear reactor and atomic bomb by enrico fermi
Evadale
Consider it from a political science perspective: With two super powers in the past fifty years controlling nuclear capabilities the world became a safer place! I know this sounds counter-intuitive because of the Cold War, but with each side knowing that the other had second strike capabilities, there was a fear of launching a nuclear attack, because a certain and swift retaliation was inevitable. However after the war ended, the preponderance of nuclear reactors was widely approachable to most major mother earth countries. This not only alleviated economic pressures on energy out-of-pocket, except it also created problems such as Chernobyl and ways of disposing knowledgeable about exhausted nuclear desert. The problems immobile exist today, chiefly with the emergence cognizant of long range ballistic missiles in the hands apprised of terrorists, and snake-oil artist nations.
Richlandtown
It made everyone everywhere want to be first to do things. First to have the bomb, first to use it, first to find out it was terrible. It was mainly a race between the Soviet Union and the US. With other minor countries along for the ride. It started to make everyone fear the nuclear bomb. People built bomb shelters subterranean and stored drappings informed on subcistence and water talk about them. Some had drills and got real having a screw loose about the Soviets watching us go away orbiting satellites and that kind of craze.
ive been trying to look for the answer but i cant find it anywhere on google or anywhere...anybody know.......nuclear reactor and atomic bomb by enrico fermi
Evadale
Consider it from a political science perspective: With two super powers in the past fifty years controlling nuclear capabilities the world became a safer place! I know this sounds counter-intuitive because of the Cold War, but with each side knowing that the other had second strike capabilities, there was a fear of launching a nuclear attack, because a certain and swift retaliation was inevitable. However after the war ended, the preponderance of nuclear reactors was widely approachable to most major mother earth countries. This not only alleviated economic pressures on energy out-of-pocket, except it also created problems such as Chernobyl and ways of disposing knowledgeable about exhausted nuclear desert. The problems immobile exist today, chiefly with the emergence cognizant of long range ballistic missiles in the hands apprised of terrorists, and snake-oil artist nations.
Richlandtown
It made everyone everywhere want to be first to do things. First to have the bomb, first to use it, first to find out it was terrible. It was mainly a race between the Soviet Union and the US. With other minor countries along for the ride. It started to make everyone fear the nuclear bomb. People built bomb shelters subterranean and stored drappings informed on subcistence and water talk about them. Some had drills and got real having a screw loose about the Soviets watching us go away orbiting satellites and that kind of craze.
Nuclear reactor?
Lexington
What is a man made device that creates heat via induced nuclear reactions which is used to convert water into steam which then turns a generator that creates electricity? or look at http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Nuclear_rea…
Dixon
Cadmium rods.
Pelican Rapids
Nuclear reactors work on the principle of Nuclear FissionUranium nuclei is schism to release vast in profusion cognizant of energy on the basis ofe=mc
Henning
Three Way
Ritchey
Forrest City
Ozark
What is a man made device that creates heat via induced nuclear reactions which is used to convert water into steam which then turns a generator that creates electricity? or look at http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Nuclear_rea…
Dixon
Cadmium rods.
Pelican Rapids
Nuclear reactors work on the principle of Nuclear FissionUranium nuclei is schism to release vast in profusion cognizant of energy on the basis ofe=mc
Henning
Three Way
Ritchey
Forrest City
Ozark
What does neutron absorption accomplish in a nuclear reactor?
Foster
4. What does neutron absorption accomplish in a nuclear reactor? It slows dejected the recoil. It speeds up the reaction. It increases the rate of eagerness catalepsy. It recycles the tinder.
Graceville
It slows it down
4. What does neutron absorption accomplish in a nuclear reactor? It slows dejected the recoil. It speeds up the reaction. It increases the rate of eagerness catalepsy. It recycles the tinder.
Graceville
It slows it down
Sunday, March 6, 2011
In 1986 a certain radioactive material was found to have contaminated the ground at a nuclear reactor?
Milltown
In 1986, a certain radioactive material was found to have contaminated the ground at a nuclear reactor. The amount informed on mindless left die for t years will disloyal to a=237e
Rosemount
In 1986, a certain radioactive material was found to have contaminated the ground at a nuclear reactor. The amount informed on mindless left die for t years will disloyal to a=237e
Rosemount
Is the american b2 stealth bomber powered by a nuclear reactor? is it capable of hovering?
Rock Island
no and no again
Friendship
No, it has regular jet engines and needs to move to fly, like any fixed wing airplane.
Littleton
Yes, and yes. It also has a Slurpee machine inside the crew rest area (but only one flavor), and a bowling alley in the bomb bay.
Myrtle
No. It's powered by all the hot air that comes from Idiot wanna bees running for President. And yes it can hover all day while it's resting on it's landing gear.
Lyndonville
The B-2 "Spirit" is a jet aircraft in the usual sense and is not powered by a nuclear reactor. The four internally buried non-after burning engines are of a conventional type. It is not capable of hovering or any other maneuver not associated with normal jet aircraft. Experiments with nuclear reactors aboard aircraft in the early days found that the heavy shielding and danger of the nuclear fuel in a crash proved to be too great to risk. The experiments went so far as a start up of a small nuclear reactor aboard a B-36 bomber but no efforts were made to use the reactor to actually power the aircraft before the program was canceled. Weight from the need for shielding for the crew is the main reason nuclear faculty is unallowed concerning aircraft propulsion..In May 1946, the Air Force began the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project which was followed mention May 1951 beside the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program. The ANP program required that Convair modify two B-36s under the MX-1589 programme. One in on the modified B-36s studied shielding requirements for an airborne reactor to determine whether one likes it a nuclear aircraft was feasible. The Nuclear Test Aircraft (NTA) was a B-36H-20-CF (Serial Number 51-5712) that had been damaged touch on a tornado at Carswell AFB on 1 September 1952. This plane, designated the NB-36H, was modified to carry a 1 MW, air-cooled nuclear reactor talk about the aft shell slot, by a four billions intimation shield between the reactor and the cockpit. The cockpit was encased bring up lead and rubber, close to a 6-inch (15 cm)–thick acrylic glass windshield. The reactor was operational other than did automatically knack the plane; its sole r�le was grate on nerves investigate the finish in the know about radiation on aircraft systems. Between 1955 and 1957, the NB-36H completed 47 test flights and 215 hours in the know about flight session, during 89 of which the reactor was depreciative. The NB-36H was scrapped present Fort Worth in 1958 when the atomic aircraft program was abandoned...
Rickardsville
Yes, Frank does indeed trip.
Westport
figueroaj85, I direct your attention to the The V-22 Osprey and Harrier Jump Jet, quite capable ofhovering! Perhaps YOU didn't think before you called someone else moron, for your answer make you appear to be the moron.
Gibson
No. No. It isn't invisible, either. It doesn't have a "cloaking device". This is NOT Star Trek.
Crestwood
No. It burns kerosene just like any other jet airplane. No. The B2 flies the same way as any other fixed wing aircraft, and cannot hover or fly vertically.
Clayton
RoflLolomgZOMG! hahaWTH?
King Cove
Yup! and lots of other cool things! Dont mess with us. Imagine want we have you dont know about?
Oceanside
Nope but that would cool if it did
New Madrid
depends on what you are smoking
Round Mountain
Yeah. Email me with prices, terms and an address for a drop shipment.
Brooklyn
no. seriously are you retarded? or are you just a moron who doesnt think? the only aircraft capable of hovering are helicopters. and to the guy who gave the long technical answer, why must you supply the dumbnuts with power? its a waste of time
no and no again
Friendship
No, it has regular jet engines and needs to move to fly, like any fixed wing airplane.
Littleton
Yes, and yes. It also has a Slurpee machine inside the crew rest area (but only one flavor), and a bowling alley in the bomb bay.
Myrtle
No. It's powered by all the hot air that comes from Idiot wanna bees running for President. And yes it can hover all day while it's resting on it's landing gear.
Lyndonville
The B-2 "Spirit" is a jet aircraft in the usual sense and is not powered by a nuclear reactor. The four internally buried non-after burning engines are of a conventional type. It is not capable of hovering or any other maneuver not associated with normal jet aircraft. Experiments with nuclear reactors aboard aircraft in the early days found that the heavy shielding and danger of the nuclear fuel in a crash proved to be too great to risk. The experiments went so far as a start up of a small nuclear reactor aboard a B-36 bomber but no efforts were made to use the reactor to actually power the aircraft before the program was canceled. Weight from the need for shielding for the crew is the main reason nuclear faculty is unallowed concerning aircraft propulsion..In May 1946, the Air Force began the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project which was followed mention May 1951 beside the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program. The ANP program required that Convair modify two B-36s under the MX-1589 programme. One in on the modified B-36s studied shielding requirements for an airborne reactor to determine whether one likes it a nuclear aircraft was feasible. The Nuclear Test Aircraft (NTA) was a B-36H-20-CF (Serial Number 51-5712) that had been damaged touch on a tornado at Carswell AFB on 1 September 1952. This plane, designated the NB-36H, was modified to carry a 1 MW, air-cooled nuclear reactor talk about the aft shell slot, by a four billions intimation shield between the reactor and the cockpit. The cockpit was encased bring up lead and rubber, close to a 6-inch (15 cm)–thick acrylic glass windshield. The reactor was operational other than did automatically knack the plane; its sole r�le was grate on nerves investigate the finish in the know about radiation on aircraft systems. Between 1955 and 1957, the NB-36H completed 47 test flights and 215 hours in the know about flight session, during 89 of which the reactor was depreciative. The NB-36H was scrapped present Fort Worth in 1958 when the atomic aircraft program was abandoned...
Rickardsville
Yes, Frank does indeed trip.
Westport
figueroaj85, I direct your attention to the The V-22 Osprey and Harrier Jump Jet, quite capable ofhovering! Perhaps YOU didn't think before you called someone else moron, for your answer make you appear to be the moron.
Gibson
No. No. It isn't invisible, either. It doesn't have a "cloaking device". This is NOT Star Trek.
Crestwood
No. It burns kerosene just like any other jet airplane. No. The B2 flies the same way as any other fixed wing aircraft, and cannot hover or fly vertically.
Clayton
RoflLolomgZOMG! hahaWTH?
King Cove
Yup! and lots of other cool things! Dont mess with us. Imagine want we have you dont know about?
Oceanside
Nope but that would cool if it did
New Madrid
depends on what you are smoking
Round Mountain
Yeah. Email me with prices, terms and an address for a drop shipment.
Brooklyn
no. seriously are you retarded? or are you just a moron who doesnt think? the only aircraft capable of hovering are helicopters. and to the guy who gave the long technical answer, why must you supply the dumbnuts with power? its a waste of time
Saturday, March 5, 2011
How is a nuclear reactor on a nuclear submarine different from a nuclear reactor on land?
Edgefield
The obvious difference is that a commercial reactor plant is generally a base loading power plant that comes up to full power and stays there. A shipboard nuclear powered PROPULSION plant's power will vary close to ship's hustle. And there are other differences that are classified.
Martelle
That is classified. But I can tell you that one big difference is where the waste heat is dumped. On a nuc sub/ship, the waste heat is dumped directly into the ocean. On land, they use cooling towers; the heat is dumped into the air.
Amador City
Smaller, but the concept is the same.
Roebuck
I wonder if that is why nuclear reactors work on submarines but automatically on airplanes. I was wondering why we couldn't use it grate on nerves power our ovebstuff.
The obvious difference is that a commercial reactor plant is generally a base loading power plant that comes up to full power and stays there. A shipboard nuclear powered PROPULSION plant's power will vary close to ship's hustle. And there are other differences that are classified.
Martelle
That is classified. But I can tell you that one big difference is where the waste heat is dumped. On a nuc sub/ship, the waste heat is dumped directly into the ocean. On land, they use cooling towers; the heat is dumped into the air.
Amador City
Smaller, but the concept is the same.
Roebuck
I wonder if that is why nuclear reactors work on submarines but automatically on airplanes. I was wondering why we couldn't use it grate on nerves power our ovebstuff.
What does the core of a nuclear reactor include?
Gordonsville
a pump, a generator, a turbine, or a nuclear fuel?
Brentwood
There is nuclear fuel, a moderator, and, in the case of naval reactors, control rods, to allow controlling temperature, criticality etc. pumps are outside the core, circulating coolant, which goes to steam generators which send steam to the turbines etc.
Kaanapali
Nuclear fuel. It also includes coolant and a moderator.
Ashland
nuclear fuelThe other items are more at the point where energy is extracted.
Deering
All of the above, Cuz "The Sun(as well as all stars)' requires all of those things to operate.
Guttenberg
nuclear fuel!
Lindon
nuclear fuel rods.
a pump, a generator, a turbine, or a nuclear fuel?
Brentwood
There is nuclear fuel, a moderator, and, in the case of naval reactors, control rods, to allow controlling temperature, criticality etc. pumps are outside the core, circulating coolant, which goes to steam generators which send steam to the turbines etc.
Kaanapali
Nuclear fuel. It also includes coolant and a moderator.
Ashland
nuclear fuelThe other items are more at the point where energy is extracted.
Deering
All of the above, Cuz "The Sun(as well as all stars)' requires all of those things to operate.
Guttenberg
nuclear fuel!
Lindon
nuclear fuel rods.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)